Divine Protection and the Architecture of Temptation: A Comparative Analysis of the Joseph Narrative

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Our Come Follow Me study of the Old Testament brings us to the scandals, betrayals, and failures of Jacob’s family. Within this intricate tapestry of human experience, there is definitely something unexpected that reveals itself from the text: God keeps building covenant people out of deeply imperfect situations. Genesis 35-41 is not a story of spiritual elites; rather, it is the story of a God who refuses to abandon His promises, even when His people stumble, fracture, or fall.

These chapters take us on a journey that begins with the defilement of Dinah and progresses through the cleansing at Bethel, Reuben’s troubling fall, and Joseph’s extraordinary rise from the depths of slavery to the exalted throne room of Egypt. The narrative is raw, human, and painfully honest, reflecting not only the complexities of familial relationships but also the broader human condition. It serves as a poignant reminder that holiness can emerge from the most chaotic and fractured places.

Amidst the turmoil, there emerges a divine pattern woven into every failure: God transforms chaos into covenant, sin into sanctification, and suffering into preparation. The patriarchs are not idealized or romanticized figures; instead, their stories mirror our own spiritual formation: messy beginnings, painful corrections, and surprising victories and breakthroughs. They remind us that the journey of faith is rarely linear and often involves grappling with our shortcomings and learning from our mistakes.

What this study hopes to accomplish is a thorough examination of Ancient Hebrew word studies, rich Latter-day Saint commentary, and scholarly insights from esteemed individuals such as Kell & Delitzsch, Clarke, and others. This blend of perspectives integrates doctrinal clarity with a deep historical context, illustrating how the Lord interacted with the earliest covenant family and, by extension, how He continues to engage with us today. If you have ever found yourself wondering whether God still works with your imperfections, Genesis 35-41 is your answer. It reaffirms that divine grace is not contingent on human perfection, but rather flows abundantly within our flaws, inviting us into a deeper relationship with Him despite our human frailties.

This understanding can be both comforting and empowering, as it challenges us to reconsider our own narratives within the larger story of redemption. As we study these passages, we are invited not only to reflect on the lessons from Jacob’s family but also to see our own lives as part of this ongoing testament to God’s love and commitment to His people throughout history.

Read More »

Part II – Lesson 6: The Church of the First Century

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Every surviving document from the earliest Christians points to one unmistakable reality: the Church of Jesus Christ was never meant to drift, improvise, or evolve by popular opinion. It was governed—actively, visibly, and globally—by living apostles who traveled, taught, corrected, and unified the Saints across thousands of miles. The idea of a fragmented, locally‑run Christianity would have been unrecognizable to the men and women who lived under apostolic direction.

Archaeologists mapping Roman travel networks now show how apostles could realistically maintain jurisdiction across vast distances. Historians studying Acts 15 identify the Jerusalem Council as the first Christian governing council—binding on every congregation. And New Testament scholars across traditions agree that Peter’s leadership was real, but never monarchical. The earliest Church functioned through a council of apostles, not a solitary bishop and not independent local leaders.

This emerging academic consensus paints a picture that looks far more like the Latter‑day Saint model of apostolic governance than the later structures of Catholicism, Orthodoxy, or Protestantism.

When Latter‑day Saints speak of a living quorum of apostles with worldwide jurisdiction, we are not inventing a new ecclesiology—we are recovering the original one. The historical record, the New Testament, and the best modern scholarship converge on the same point: the Church Christ established was led by a unified body of apostles who held authority for the entire household of faith.

This is the pattern that disappeared after their deaths. This is the pattern the Restoration restores.

What to Look for in this Lesson: 

  1. Most of the religions of the first century of the Christian era stressed the acquisition of salvation through mystical initiatory rites or elaborate ceremonies. Christianity ignored these aspects of religion and stressed a high standard of moral conduct. 
  2. Christianity was a rapidly expanding movement in the first century. Arrangements were made for supervision so that it would not become disunited. 
  3. Enrichment material. In Apostasy from the Divine Church, pp. 39-77 can be found some unique quotations and comments concerning the doctrines and worship of the early Christian church. 

How This Lesson Functions in LDS Apologetics

Apostolic jurisdiction is not an abstract ecclesiological idea—it is the structural backbone of the New Testament Church. Showing that the earliest Christians were governed by a mobile, authoritative quorum of apostles accomplishes three apologetic goals:

  • It demonstrates that the original Church was hierarchical, organized, and led by living apostles, not by Scripture alone or by independent congregations.
  • It shows that later Christian structures—papal monarchy, conciliar episcopacy, or Protestant congregationalism—do not match the first‑century pattern.
  • It clarifies that the Restoration restores a model that actually existed, rather than inventing a new one.

This lesson therefore becomes a bridge between historical reconstruction and Restoration theology.

Read More »

The “All or Nothing” Fallacy: Why Tyson Guess’s Logic Fails the Scriptural and Historical Test

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

If there is any given reason for someone to question and leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Tyson Guess has built a shiny logical-looking exit ramp. However, if you are willing to take a moment and slow down to breathe, the architecture of his argument is built on a very sandy foundation – specifically, a fundamental misunderstanding of how God interacts with fallible mortals.

It is in his recent article over at Medium – “One False Revelation Collapses Mormonism” – where he attempts to use the Book of Abraham as a silver bullet to take down the entire Latter-day Saint Faith. He proposes that because the surviving Egyptian papyri does not match the Book of Abraham linguistically, one ought to conclude that Prophet Joseph Smith was a fraud. By extension, he claims that this means the Book of Mormon is a lie perpetuated upon the 19th-Century American populace—and by many individuals today.

What Guess seems to overlook is that faith and belief systems are complex, multifaceted experiences that often transcend mere textual analysis. Having immersed myself in the scriptures and extensively researched various scholarly articles on the Bible, the Book of Mormon, and the Book of Abraham, I am not one to shy away from the hard questions that arise. Indeed, grappling with difficult topics is an integral part of faith development.

Moreover, it is important to remember that neither the Church nor its members need to hide from the papyri or the so-called “missing scroll” theories. These subjects, when approached with integrity and a commitment to truth, can lead to a deepened understanding of the faith. Once we apply proper scriptural exegesis and peer-reviewed scholarship to the questions surrounding these texts, Guess’s assertion of an “inescapable conclusion” begins to look more like a desperate reach rather than a definitive argument against the faith.

Ultimately, it’s essential to recognize the broader context in which these discussions occur. Many who leave or reconsider their faith do so not only based on intellectual arguments but also due to personal experiences, feelings, and the intricate tapestry of their spiritual lives. Engaging with such matters requires not only scholarly rigor but also compassion and understanding for individual journeys. The dialogue around faith and doubt can be rich and illuminating, offering avenues for personal growth and deeper connections with God and each other.

If the Book of Mormon is true, the Book of Abraham must be true.

The Book of Abraham is demonstrably false.

Therefore the Book of Mormon is false.

That is not a rhetorical flourish. It is a logical necessity rooted in the nature of God himself. God does not put his name on lies. God does not commission a prophet and then authorize that prophet to deliver falsehood as scripture. A divine commission that produces falsehood is not divine. Which means the two books stand or fall together. They claim the same origin: the gift and power of God through Joseph Smith. That origin is either reliable, or it is not. It cannot be selectively reliable. If one product of that commission is demonstrably false, the commission itself is false, and everything resting on it falls with it.

This article proves each premise. By the end, the conclusion is inescapable.

Tyson Guess’s argument rests upon presuppositional apologetics and is quite a rigid syllogism where he makes the first point regarding how the Book of Abraham stand or fall together. The second point is how he views the Book of Abraham as “demonstrably false” because it is not a literal linguistic translation of the surviving papyri. And third, he concludes that because the Book of Abraham and the Book of Mormon are false, Joseph Smith, therefore, is a false prophet under the presupposed interpretative understanding of Deuteronomy 18. His argument leads to the conclusion that the entire Latter-day Saint belief system collapses under scrutiny.

Steelmanning Tyson Guess’s Assertions

The strongest point he makes is the physical evidence: the Sensen papyri (the fragments recovered in 1967)1 do indeed contain standard Egyptian funerary texts (The Book of Breathings) and do not contain the text of the Book of Abraham. This mismatch is acknowledged by the Church in the Gospel Topics Essays, which lends credibility to his claim. If one’s definition of “translation” is strictly limited to a 21st-century academic decoding of hieroglyphs, Guess’s point feels quite weighty and compelling.

However, to thoroughly engage with Guess’s perspective, it is essential to steelman his position—articulating it in its strongest form—before launching into a counter-argument. A steelman approach involves understanding the nuances of his claims, thus allowing for a more productive discourse. From there, one can examine the logical fallacies that underlie his assertions, such as potential fallacies of composition—implying that the failure of one work invalidates the entirety of a belief system—or false dilemmas that oversimplify complex theological concepts.

In addressing the primary contention regarding translations, scholars advocate for a broader understanding of the term “translation.” The restoration of the Book of Abraham is often viewed not merely as a linguistic exercise but as a theological endeavor. Thus, one might argue that the translation in question relies on Divine inspiration rather than strict linguistic fidelity. An exegetical interpretation of the text could highlight its contextual significance within the framework of Latter-day Saint theology, countering Guess’s assertion of its demonstrable falsehood.

Engaging with peer-reviewed literature reveals diverse scholarly opinions on ancient texts, translations, and the role of revelatory processes in religious contexts. Numerous Latter-day Saint scholars and Egyptologists have contributed rigorous analyses of the Book of Abraham, arguing that the text retains spiritual truths even if its historical and linguistic basis is complex.

While it is necessary to acknowledge the weight of Tyson Guess’s arguments, it is equally important to invite readers to examine the evidence for themselves rigorously. The discourse surrounding the Book of Abraham is multifaceted, integrating historical, linguistic, and theological dimensions. Encouraging critical thought fosters a more robust conversation, allowing individuals to explore the nuances of faith, history, and evidence as they pertain to the Latter-day Saint belief system. Through this lens, one can engage not only with the arguments presented but also with the broader implications for understanding religious texts in a modern context.

Read More »

The Architecture of Grace: A Systematic Analysis of the Everlasting Covenant

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Jacob’s story is not the tale of a man who finally got his act together. It is the story of a God who refused to let go. From the well where Rebekah ran to serve a stranger, to the night Jacob wrestled until dawn, Genesis 24–33 reveals a God who enters the grit of human weakness and patiently reshapes a people who learn—slowly, painfully, beautifully—to let Him prevail. This is not ancient history; it is the architecture of grace still unfolding in every disciple who dares to surrender.

Every scene in this week’s Come, Follow Me block is a doorway into covenant transformation. A servant prays at a well and finds a woman whose kindness alters the future. Two brothers clash over a birthright that neither fully understands. A fugitive dreams of a ladder where heaven touches earth. A deceiver becomes Israel. A wounded family becomes whole again. These are not disconnected stories; they are covenant threads woven by a God who meets His children in deserts, dreams, and wrestles—and invites them into a life only He can build.

The New Testament echoes these moments at every turn: Christ offering living water at Jacob’s well, the Father running to embrace a prodigal son, the Savior calling His disciples to leave lesser things for eternal ones. The Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price amplify the same truth: God prevails when His children yield.

This study follows an expository and exegetical method—tracing themes of covenant, surrender, revelation, reconciliation, and divine guidance across the Old Testament, New Testament, Restoration scripture, and the teachings of modern prophets. It is expository, exegetical, devotional, and practical. It is written for individuals who want more than information—they want transformation.

If you’ve ever wrestled with God, waited for answers, feared reconciliation, or wondered whether He remembers you, Genesis 24–33 is your story. And the God who prevailed in Jacob’s life is ready to prevail in yours.

Read More »

Latter-day Saint Faith as a “Narcissistic System”? A Structured, Evidence – Based Response

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a high-demand and structurally narcissistic organization? Apparently, this is the newest claim being peddled on podcasts and social media networks, gaining traction in various online circles. And it is quite telling for such a bold claim. It is one thing to share personal experiences and insights into how faith in Christ led to the healing of trauma and abuse, which can foster a sense of community and understanding. However, what is defiantly and demonstratively uncalled for is the onslaught of these claims that are thrown around with terms like gaslighting, narcissistic tendencies, and arm-chair pop-psychology vernacular, often lacking in substantiation or context. Such language can be inflammatory and misleading, reducing complex issues into simplistic labels. It seems to be more of a projection of the one making these claims and not about sound, objective, and reasonable arguments that are rested on evidence-based truths and realities, which are essential for a thoughtful and constructive discourse. In this climate of social media sensationalism, it is crucial to approach such sensitive discussions with nuance and an emphasis on genuine dialogue rather than sensational accusations.

And enter a recent episode of the Almost Awakened podcast where Teresa Hobbs attempts to argue that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not merely a high demand religion; but it is structurally narcissistic. She claims the church mirrors the dynamics of narcissistic abuse, breeds codependency, suppresses intuition, and even contributes to chronic illness and nervous-system dysregulation.

Now, do not hear what I am not saying (or in this case read into what I am not saying). I am not making light of someone’s traumatic experience – nor should any make light of someone’s past where they struggled with abuse, family history of dysfunction, and even their own addictions and mental health challenges. It is crucial to approach these topics with sensitivity and understanding.

Neither am I here to offer any clinical or therapeutic advice, medical recommendations, or render any professional diagnosis. The nuances of mental health issues require a level of expertise that extends far beyond casual conversation or podcasting. Many listeners may find themselves grappling with their own experiences, and the last thing they need is a misinformed diagnosis or unfounded advice. It is important to encourage individuals to seek professional help if they are facing significant challenges.

The sad reality – when these podcasters speak and throw around the terms narcissism, gaslighting, and do not make any disclaimer, they most likely are offering up a diagnosis and recommendations. Both of which is unprofessional and unethical and does more harm than good for their audience. In doing so, they risk invalidating the real and complex experiences of those who have genuinely faced such issues, and they undermine the credibility of mental health conversations.

Furthermore, creating a false sense of understanding about such intricate dynamics can lead to a slew of misconceptions. It must be emphasized that discussions around mental health, especially in relation to specific organizations, require great care and should prioritize the lived experiences of individuals, incorporating scientific understanding and the need for professional guidance.

There is good reason one needs to provide such a disclaimer. It not only protects the integrity of the conversation but also respects the audience by acknowledging the complexity of psychological issues. Offering blanket statements or proclamations without context distracts from meaningful dialogue and can lead to a harmful oversimplification of serious matters. It is essential for podcasters and content creators to recognize the responsibility that comes with discussing sensitive topics, ensuring that they equip their listeners with proper resources rather than inadvertently misguiding them.

And so, what is the reason to respond to this recent podcaster’s claim? Given what I just said? Because the host, Teresa Hobbs, is making a very serious accusatory claim about the LDS Faith – one that delves into the lived experiences of individuals who have suffered real trauma, abuse, and dysfunction. These claims are not just mere allegations; they bear significant weight as they touch upon deeply personal and painful stories that countless individuals carry with them. It also speaks more harm in condemning and judging many who live healthy, productive lives – specifically, many who have overcome their past issues, demonstrating resilience and strength. By unfairly generalizing the experiences of a few, Hobbs risks painting an entire community in a negative light, overshadowing the positive contributions and transformations of those who strive to move forward. Furthermore, such a narrative can perpetuate stigma and misunderstanding, detracting from the support and understanding that so many seek and deserve. It is crucial to engage with these topics thoughtfully, considering the wide-ranging implications that come with public discourse, especially when it involves faith and personal recovery journeys.

Read More »

A Logical and Reasonable Refutation of Bill Young’s Critique of President Dallin H. Oaks

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Is President Dallin H. Oaks issuing a “cult-like gag order,” or is he simply teaching the same pattern of discernment used by the Apostles in the New Testament? In a recent episode of Truth to Mormons, Bill Young attempts to dismantle President Oaks’ BYU Devotional, “Coming Closer to Jesus Christ.” Young frames the talk as “damage control” and “thought stopping,” suggesting that it serves as a mechanism to silence dissent and enforce conformity among followers. However, when you peel back the rhetoric, you find a series of logical fallacies and a fundamental misunderstanding of Latter-day Saint theology. As a student of both the scriptures and logic, my goal is not to trade insults but to examine the evidence critically and thoughtfully. We will look at Young’s arguments in a detailed manner, “steelman” his positions to ensure they are understood fairly, and then provide a clear, scriptural, and logical rebuttal from the LDS perspective. This process will involve not only a close reading of the original devotional but also an analysis of the core principles of Latter-day Saint belief, including the importance of personal revelation and the role of modern prophets. By engaging in this thoughtful discourse, we can arrive at a more nuanced understanding of the issues at hand, fostering an environment where productive dialogue can thrive over simplistic accusations and misunderstandings.

Summarizing the BYU Devotional: President Dallin H. Oaks

In his first major address as President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (acting as the most senior leader alongside President Nelson), Dallin H. Oaks spoke to the students at BYU, emphasizing the profound relationship between faith and knowledge. His central thesis was that Jesus Christ is the answer to all doubts. He acknowledged that members have concerns regarding history, doctrine, and social issues, which can often lead to confusion and uncertainty in their spiritual journeys. Rather than ignoring or dismissing these concerns, he proposed a “spiritual method” of knowledge—reminding students that while the “scientific method” is useful for man’s discoveries and advancements, the divine truths and the things of God are known only by the Spirit of God. He urged students to focus intently on the “Covenant Path,” which serves as a guiding light in their lives, and to actively seek associates who reinforce their faith and commitment to the gospel rather than those who specialize in “speculation and false information.” By cultivating a supportive community grounded in truth, Oaks encouraged the students to strengthen their testimonies, embrace their spiritual gifts, and remain steadfast in their faith, knowing that their journey may be fraught with challenges, yet filled with divine guidance and enlightenment.

Objective of This Post

The objective is to demonstrate that Bill Young’s “rebuttal” relies on category errors and circular reasoning. This analysis will focus our attention on the logical fallacies present in Young’s arguments while simultaneously establishing that President Oaks’ counsel is biblically sound, consistent with the core teachings and principles found within scripture. This article will show how Young’s “Bible-only” attacks, rather than solidifying his position, actually contradict the very Bible he claims to defend, creating a paradox that undermines his credibility. As we unpack these discrepancies, we aim to illuminate the discrepancies between Young’s interpretations and the foundational messages of the Bible, revealing the inherent weaknesses in his argumentation and highlighting how a proper understanding of scripture can affirm Oaks’ viewpoint rather than discredit it.

Read More »

Day 2 – A Single Step

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

And there are also secret combinations, even as in times of old, according to the combinations of the devil, for he is the founder of all these things; yea, … and he leadeth them by the neck with a flaxen cord, until he bindeth them with his strong cords forever.
~ 2 Nephi 26:22 ~

There’s a reason the scriptures don’t say the adversary drags us with chains from the beginning. They say he starts with a flaxen cord—soft, subtle, almost unnoticeable.

Flaxen cords feel harmless. They feel like “I’m fine.” They feel like “It’s not that bad.” They feel like “Everyone else is the problem.” They can be associated with small compromises and everyday distractions that initially seem trivial, but over time can lead us down a path we never intended to walk.

We might find ourselves rationalizing decisions that, in retrospect, clearly lead away from our values or beliefs. Gradually, we become accustomed to the tightened grip of that cord, oblivious to our increasing vulnerability. Over time, each little distraction or compromise we accept acts as another loop in that cord, binding us tighter and tighter until we feel as though escape is impossible.

And then one day, you wake up and realize you’re not holding the cord. The cord is holding you. The realization can be jolting; it is a moment of clarity where we recognize how far we’ve strayed from our intended path. This moment often comes with feelings of regret, confusion, or despair, as we confront the reality of our situation.

This is exactly how 2 Nephi 26:22 operates in real life. Not with sudden destruction—but with slow spiritual erosion until the truth becomes unavoidable. It’s a gradual process, where the adversary uses our own indifference against us, allowing darker patterns to take root before we even realize the danger. Awareness becomes the first step toward liberation. By recognizing the effects of the flaxen cord, we can take action—whether seeking support, reevaluating our choices, or returning to foundational truths that can help strengthen us against the subtlety of temptation. Thus, the journey back to freedom is not only possible but essential for spiritual renewal and growth.

Hello and welcome fellow travelers. Today, we are going to focus on what it means to take that single step. How it breaks the flaxen cords that brought us into captivity, and how we take necessary action when we step out in faith and into God’s grace – a grace that empowers us to seek His will, His purpose, and brings us into a right relationship with who he is, his love, tender mercies, and joy.

Let’s pray

Read More »

Day 1 – The First Step – Honesty

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

“I do not boast in my own strength, nor in my own wisdom; but behold, my joy is full, yea, my heart is brim with joy, and I will rejoice in my God. Yeah, I know that I am nothing: as to my strength I am weak; therefore I will not boast of myself, but I will boast of my God, for in his strength I can do all things” (Alma 26:11-12)

Addiction surrenders later freedom to choose. Through chemical means, one can literally become disconnected from his or her own will.” (Elder Russell M. Nelson, in Conference Report, October 1988, 7; or Ensign, Nov. 1988, 7). 

There comes a moment in our own personal journey when the illusion of self-sufficiency collapses. We discover that the strength we trusted has betrayed us, and the wisdom we followed has led us into bondage. Yet this moment – this breaking – is not the end. It is the doorway to the only strength that can save us.

Welcome, fellow travelers. Today we walk together into the holy paradox of recovery: the place where admitting our nothingness becomes the birthplace of divine strength. The scriptures do not shame our weakness – they reveal it as the very place where Christ meets us. This journey towards wholeness involves a profound acknowledgment of our vulnerability and the limitations of our mortal existence. As we explore these spiritual truths, we uncover the transformative power inherent in our weaknesses, enabling us to forge a deeper relationship with our Creator.

Heavenly Father, we come as we are – empty, weary, and aware of our need. Thank you for your grace that teaches us the freedom of surrender. Thank you for teaching us the joy of boasting only in Your grace that strengthens us in our own weakness. Thank you for your grace that fills our nothingness with Thy strength, that we may rise in the light of Thy truth – in Jesus’ name, Amen.

There is a sacred honesty that God requires before He can remake a soul. It is not the honesty of mere confession, nor the honesty of admitting mistakes. It is the honesty of reaching the end of our own resources and discovering that our strength has never been enough. Alma’s declaration— “I know that I am nothing”—is not the groan of despair but the first breath of spiritual clarity. It is the moment when the soul stops pretending, shedding the facade of self-reliance to embrace the empowering truth of dependence on God. This is where healing begins—a transformative process that beckons us to lay down our burdens.

Read More »

5 Solid Reasons the Abrahamic Covenant Makes the Trinity Impossible: The Father and Son Revealed in Scripture

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

For centuries, Christians have read Genesis 22 as a foreshadowing of Christ’s sacrifice. But when you slow down and actually study the text — the covenant structure, the typology, the roles of Abraham, Isaac, and the Angel of the Lord — something startling emerges:

The story only makes sense if the Father and the Son are separate, distinct divine beings. Not one being in three manifestations. Not “without body, parts, or passions.” Not the metaphysics of the 4th‑century creeds.

Genesis 22 quietly dismantles the classical Trinity — not through argument, but through narrative logic. The intricate details within the text draw attention to the unique roles played by each character involved, suggesting a profound relationship rather than a singularity of essence. The distinct actions and motivations of Abraham and Isaac, coupled with the divine intervention of the Angel of the Lord, create a rich tapestry of covenantal dynamics that aligns with the understanding of a separate Father and Son.

And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

The text itself tells us that Abraham’s offering of Isaac was “a similitude of God and His Only Begotten Son” (Jacob 4:5). That means the story is not merely symbolic — it is covenantal drama. A reenactment. A prophetic preview. It sets up a scenario where the identity of God is not just established by abstract definitions, but by tangible actions and relationships that unfold throughout the narrative, reinforcing the need for distinct divine entities within the story.

  • Abraham = the Father (El Elyon)
  • Isaac = the Son (YHWH / Jesus Christ)
  • The Angel of the Lord = YHWH intervening
  • The Ram = the substitute sacrifice provided by the Son Himself

But here’s the problem for classical Trinitarian theology:

A being cannot covenant with Himself. A being cannot offer Himself to Himself. A being cannot substitute for Himself.

Yet that is exactly what the Abrahamic narrative requires if the Father and the Son are not distinct beings. The narrative requires a sacrificial offering that conveys deep relational significance. The act of Abraham being asked to sacrifice his son not only serves as a test of faith, but also as a prelude to a much greater divine act of love and sacrifice. The intricacies presented in Genesis 22 reflect the essence of divine relationships that contradict the notion of a singular being.

The entire story collapses under Nicene metaphysics — but it becomes beautifully coherent in a Latter‑day Saint reading of the Godhead. This perspective not only makes sense of the narrative but also invites readers to engage with the text in a way that reveals a more nuanced understanding of who God is in a relationship with humanity.

This isn’t sensationalism. It’s careful, text‑driven theology supported by biblical scholarship and restored scripture. Scholars widely recognize Genesis 22 as a covenantal test and a typology of divine sacrifice. The events leading to the sacrificial act have a resonance throughout scripture, inviting further exploration of God’s nature and His intentions toward His children.

The Book of Mormon explicitly identifies the event as a similitude of the Father and the Son (Jacob 4:5), strengthening the argument for distinct divine persons within the Abrahamic narrative. Classical creeds describe God as “without body, parts, or passions” (Westminster Confession). That metaphysical framework cannot sustain the relational, embodied, covenantal drama of Genesis 22. It lacks the relational depth that is essential to understanding the interactions within the story.

In this article, we’ll walk through:

  • Why the Abraham–Isaac narrative presupposes two divine persons in real covenantal relationship.
  • How the cut covenant (Genesis 15) requires two parties who can engage in meaningful interaction.
  • Why the Angel of the Lord is best understood as YHWH, the premortal Christ, intervening in history with divine purpose.
  • Why the ram, not a lamb, matters significantly as a symbol of substitutionary sacrifice.
  • And how all of this aligns seamlessly with Latter‑day Saint theology while exposing the weaknesses of post‑biblical Trinitarian formulations.

If you’ve ever sensed that the God of the creeds feels abstract, distant, or philosophically over‑engineered, Genesis 22 offers a different vision — one rooted in relationship, embodiment, covenant, and divine love that is anything but passionless. Through this lens, one can find a God who is intimately involved in the lives of His people, crafting a narrative of redemption that resonates with both ancient and modern believers.

Read More »

Come Follow Me: Feb 16-22 – Genesis 12-17; Abraham 1-2 | “To be a Greater Follower of Righteousness

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Abraham’s story is more than ancient history — it is the blueprint for every disciple who seeks covenant belonging, divine protection, and a future filled with hope. This week’s Come, Follow Me study reveals how God transforms ordinary people into extraordinary instruments of righteousness. The narrative not only showcases the life of Abraham but also serves as a powerful reminder that faith can lead to significant change and divine outcomes.

From Abraham’s near‑sacrifice in Ur to the sweeping promises of the Abrahamic Covenant, these chapters unveil the pattern of deliverance, faith, priesthood, and covenant identity that defines the gospel of Jesus Christ. Each event in Abraham’s journey can be viewed as a stepping stone toward understanding how God interacts with humankind and the purpose He has for each of us in fulfilling His divine plan.

Drawing from Genesis, the Book of Abraham, the Pearl of Great Price Student Manual, and the Come, Follow Me 2026 manual, this commentary provides doctrinal clarity, historical context, and practical application for modern disciples. This comprehensive approach allows readers to see the relevancy of Abraham’s story in today’s context, encouraging them to deepen their understanding of their own faith journeys.

Abraham’s life is a witness that righteous desires shape destiny. Though born into a family steeped in idolatry, Abraham “sought for the blessings of the fathers” and desired “to be a greater follower of righteousness” (Abraham 1:2). His story demonstrates that God honors righteous desire with revelation, deliverance, and covenant belonging. This ideal underscores the power of longing for a deeper connection with God and striving for righteousness, emphasizing that such pursuits are met with divine support and guidance.

This study argues that:

Abraham’s early trials reveal the pattern of divine deliverance. Each trial faced by Abraham not only tested his faith but also set the stage for miraculous intervention by the Lord, reinforcing the belief that faith often precedes divine action.

The Abrahamic Covenant is the foundation of all latter‑day covenant identity. This covenant is essential in understanding the relationship between God and His people, serving as a framework for spiritual growth and community among believers.

Abraham’s life models what it means to walk the covenant path with faith, sacrifice, and obedience. His unwavering commitment in the face of uncertainty illustrates the essence of discipleship. Disciples today are called to emulate this model, highlighting the importance of perseverance, trust, and dedication on their own journeys.

Ultimately, the exploration of Abraham’s life serves as both an educational and inspirational guide for individuals seeking to embrace a deeper sense of identity within their covenant relationship with God. It challenges readers to reflect on their own journeys, urging them to strive for the kind of faith that transforms lives and leads to lasting hope.

God often begins His work in the quiet soil of longing, where dreams lie dormant, waiting for the gentle touch of faith to cultivate them. In this sacred space, where silence speaks volumes and sincere desires take root, the heart learns to hope anew, nurturing seeds of potential that, with time and devotion, will blossom into a beautiful manifestation of His divine purpose. It is here that we discover the deep connection between our longings and the unfolding of His plans, reminding us that even in the stillness, something remarkable is taking shape beneath the surface, preparing us for the amazing journey ahead.

Read More »