General Conference Reflection: Come Home – The Savior’s Call to the Weary

There have been those moments in my own life when silence felt louder than any noise – when distance from God doesn’t come through rebellion, it comes through weariness, disappointments, or quiet drifting. In those moments – I never thought of them as sacred hidden places. However, Elder Clark G. Gilbert’s message, Come Home, reminded me of how Christ rescued me. Elder Gilbert’s testimony is both disarming and deeply personal: Jesus Christ is not waiting to condemn you – He is actively calling you back. This is not an invitation for us to return to any religious belief – it is a return to a covenantal relationship where Christ desires to bring us face-to-face with our Heavenly Father. Through this process, we find healing, restoration, peace, and the joy that surpasses all understanding. It is an invitation for those wandering and lost today.

And here is the profound truth Elder Gilbert centers his message: Christ is not only our Redeemer – but He is also our Repairer. This distinction is of immense importance. Many of us hold to the idea that Jesus forgives us – however, how many of us truly believe and experience the reality of His power to restore us? Through personal stories, doctrinal clarity, and prophetic and apostolic witness, this message unfolds the spiritual reality and truth – no fracture; spiritual, emotional, or relational, is beyond the Savior’s power to amend through the gift and tender mercies of the infinite atonement.

Elder Gilbert’s message acknowledges the real barriers that prevent people from returning. It is these barriers I have found myself referring back to regarding my own devotional teachings and messages. The very same barriers I’ve struggled with over the years in returning back to the faith of the Restored Gospel. Feelings of not belonging, feelings of inadequacy, doubt, or even feeling trapped within cultural or religious expectations often obscure an intimate relationship with Jesus Christ. Elder Gilbert does not dismiss these struggles; instead, he speaks directly into them with compassion and clarity. His approach is refreshing as it resonates with the hearts of many who grapple with these complex emotions.

For me, the ultimate truth of this message is not about people leaving the faith – it is about the reason they are able to return. And for me, the Gospel of Jesus Christ is not a place for perfect people – it is a home for those returning. This home isn’t just a metaphorical return; it’s a genuine invitation to embrace love, understanding, and acceptance in the arms of a Savior who knows our struggles intimately.

Consider what the Savior taught regarding this profound and yet simplistic principle and truth:

As Jesus was walking along, he saw a man called Matthew sitting at the tax-collection station, and he said to him, “Follow me.” And he got up and followed him. And as he sat at dinner in the house, many tax collectors and sinners came and were sitting with Jesus and his disciples. When the Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” But when he heard this, he said, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. Go and learn what this means, I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I have not come to call the righteous but sinners.” (Matthew 9:10-13, NRSVUE).

In this scene, Jesus is having a meal with Matthew, a former tax collector, and a mixed crowd of people whom the religious leaders dubbed as tax collectors and sinners. When the Pharisees, the self-appointed guardians of what’s pure and pious, ask why he would spend time with such unclean folks, Jesus turns the whole conversation on its head. He doesn’t see himself as a judge but as a healer. He highlights that his mission isn’t about reaffirming those who think they’re just fine—essentially the self-righteous—but about reaching out to those who are honest enough to see their own brokenness. By quoting the prophet Hosea—“I desire mercy, not sacrifice”—he underscores that compassion trumps strict religious rules or pushing people away.

In addition to this powerful depiction, it’s crucial to reflect on the implications of this teaching in our daily lives. The moments we find ourselves in judgment rather than in service can detract from our mission as followers of Christ. When we look at the world with eyes that see brokenness, we are called to serve rather than criticize. Our posture should always be one of humility, recognizing our own need for mercy.

For me, Christ is not waiting to condemn; even the Apostle Paul writes: “Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1, NRSVUE). In my own life, those I have ministered to and sat in counsel with over the years have experienced this invitation to come back to Him. And the sad reality is: how often do we stand in the shoes of the Pharisees? How often are we prone to judge and criticize those who have left the LDS Faith, or even those who have left the Christian faith in general? While the Pharisees saw the dinner table as a place of judgment and an opportunity to avoid those who are deemed unworthy – sinners – Christ saw it as a place of ministry, healing, and deep connection.

One of the oft-repeated excuses that frustrates me is this: The Gospel is Perfect; the Church is True – the people are not. This bumper sticker cliché seems to slap a band-aid on people who have truly been disappointed, hurt, or pushed to the side as if they don’t matter or belong. This perspective can inadvertently perpetuate a culture of exclusion rather than inclusion, failing to recognize that the essence of the Gospel is about love and reconciliation.

In reality, Jesus’ message invites every individual, regardless of their past or present struggles, to experience the fullness of His grace and mercy—a message that should resonate deeply within the walls of every church and community devoted to His service.

Read More »

Power of Silence in the Christian Life

The world disciples you in noise—but God forms you in stillness.

From the first waking moment, your soul is pulled outward—demands, responsibilities, distractions, internal unrest. Even your prayers can become hurried transactions, filled with words yet empty of encounter. But Scripture reveals a different way—a hidden life cultivated not in striving, but in stillness before God.

Most believers have learned how to speak to God. Few have learned how to be with Him. This distinction is crucial for those seeking a more profound relationship. Speaking often feels like filling an obligation, while being allows for an intimate exchange that transcends mere words. In this fast-paced world, the stillness can feel foreign, almost uncomfortable, yet it is within this quiet space that the heart finds its rest and revelation.

Yet the invitation remains: not to louder devotion, but to deeper communion. Not to more words—but to greater awareness of His presence. As we step back from the clamor of life, we begin to attune our hearts to His whispers, learning that sometimes silence is the most powerful form of communication. The question is not whether God is speaking… but whether you have become quiet enough to hear.

In stillness, you discover a sacred rhythm where your spirit can align with His. You can find strength for your day, peace that surpasses understanding, and clarity in the midst of confusion. It is in these still moments that the burdens of the world begin to lift, surrendering your concerns into His capable hands. Embrace the call to stillness; allow it to transform your relationship with the Divine, leading you not only into a deeper understanding but a more vibrant experience of faith.

Anchor Verse: “Stop striving and know that I am God; I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth.” — Psalm 46:10 (NASB 2020)

Stillness, then, is not a passive retreat from life—it is a deliberate return to the One who holds your life. It is the quiet reorientation of the soul, the sacred pause where you stop letting the world set your pace and allow God to set your posture. In stillness, you are not withdrawing from responsibility; you are withdrawing from the illusion that you must carry it all alone.

This is why Scripture does not merely suggest stillness—it commands it. Because without stillness, you cannot hear. Without stillness, you cannot discern. Without stillness, you cannot remember who God is or who you are in Him. Stillness becomes the doorway through which trust is formed, faith is strengthened, and clarity is restored.

This command is more than an invitation to quiet your mind; it is a call to reorient your entire inner life around the reality of who God is. Stillness becomes the place where striving finally loosens its grip and trust begins to take root. But what does it actually look like to live this out in the chaos of real life? How do we move from noise to knowing, from hurry to holy stillness?

That’s where the deeper work begins.

Read More »

Solidarity in Our Suffering

Every one of us knows what it feels like to wake up inside a prison we never saw ourselves enter. Not a prison of steel bars, but the kind built from fear, shame, distorted thinking, and the quiet suffering we carry alone. These are the prisons that don’t show up on a background check—but they shape our lives all the same.

And here’s the part we rarely admit to ourselves: most of the time, we don’t even realize we’re locked inside. We just feel the weight. The cycle. The hopelessness. Recovery calls this “your side of the street.” MRT calls it “recognizing your prison.” Scripture calls it remembering—remembering those in chains as though you were chained with them (Hebrews 13:3). Because the moment you recognize your own captivity is the moment you become capable of standing with someone else in theirs. Not with pity. Not with judgment. But with solidarity born from shared humanity and redeemed suffering.

I’ve lived in those invisible cells. I’ve counseled people trapped in them. And I’ve watched God use both literal and internal prisons to refine character, restore dignity, and reveal His mercy in ways comfort never could. So when I talk about suffering in solidarity, I’m not speaking as an observer—I’m speaking as someone who has been behind those walls and found Christ already waiting there. This devotional isn’t about theory. It’s about truth. It’s about recovery. It’s about the Gospel. And it’s about learning to see our own captivity clearly enough that we can walk beside others without superiority, without fear, and without pretending we’ve never been imprisoned ourselves.

What is the prison of your own suffering? For me, it was those moments where my life seemed to come undone – the rug pulled right out from underneath me. Locked in my own irrational thought process, false beliefs, and not understanding the reason I seemed to constantly be in this never-ending cycle of always finding myself in a place of brokenness, suffering, and hopelessness. There are moments in many individuals lives where they are in some form of a prison. And this prison may be a literal prison, or it may be a product of one’s circumstances. Whether this is a place of financial debt, broken relationship, physical limitations, disability, or injury, or any other constraining circumstance. 

Yet, the single most travesty within our Christian faith communities and fellowship is when fellow saints perceive those who are in some form of prison and are suffering – see them with a biased assumption that God has not favored them. That, they have committed some form of sin, or are spiritual rebellion. To some extent, there are those who have this idea that Christians suffering in their own prisons are lacking faith in God. 

However, let’s consider the Apostle Paul: he probably experienced similar judgments and perceptions. Specifically, when we read his epistles that were written while he was in prison and suffering for the cause of the Gospel. Early saints of the way may have seen his trouble as a sign of God’s own disfavor and wondered how someone with so much potential had fallen to such lowly depths. 

Now, consider the reality of what I am wanting to share with you today. Prisons today different from person to person – and are full of God’s beloved sons and daughters. Despite this reality, He uses these prison moments in profound and mighty ways. We see how he used Paul’s suffering and prison moments, Joseph of Egypt, John the Baptist, John the beloved disciple, and numerous other men within scripture. Most of these men were used by God in powerful ways and they have experienced imprisonment, captivity, or depth of loneliness and despair – and our Heavenly Father, in His tender mercies, used those moments. 

Read More »

Elder Patrick Kearon: “About His Business” | Sandpaper People and the Refiner’s Fire

How often have we walked into our Sunday meetings looking for a sanctuary from the world that seems to be troubled, in a state of confusion, and quite volatile and toxic? And yet, we step into a place where one may frequently find something much more challenging: a room full of people who have a wide range of differences. It may be quite tempting to see these differences as hinderances or even obstacles to our own spiritual growth. However, what if such annoyances of our specific wards are actually the very tools God uses to encourage, edify, and strengthen us? And sometimes, these people seemed to rub us the wrong way – you know – sandpaper people.1

Wait…what? Sandpaper people? Yep, exactly – sandpaper people are those who may rub us the wrong way. You know, the ones that seemingly get under our skin sometimes? The ones we may want to avoid, even at church. And yet, you may be wondering – what is a sandpaper person? And furthermore, what purpose do they serve?

Sandpaper is designed to smooth out and refine surfaces. A sheet, or strip, of paper that is quite abrasive, depending on the grade, where it smooths out rough spots, removes rust or old paint. It is also used to prepare surfaces for painting, staining, and polishing. In essence, sandpaper’s sole intention and purpose is to refine and smooth out the rough edges. And that is exactly what sandpaper do – they smooth out the rough edges and refine us in ways that help shape and transform us into whom our Heavenly Father has called us to become.

Isaiah 48:10 says, “See, I have refined you but not like silver; I have tested you in the furnace of adversity.” And you may be wondering, what does Isaiah 48:10 and sandpaper people have to do with attending Church?

Here is the simple truth: God does not refine us in isolation, nor does He shape us only through peaceful, agreeable circumstances. Instead, our Heavenly Father refines us in the furnace of adversity – and sometimes, that furnace of adversity looks surprisingly ordinary. You know, the person singing loudly behind you during Sacrament meeting. The kids with an apparent case of ants in their pants and parents doing their best to help them practice reverence. Or the person who shows up in jeans and a shirt with no tie. People that somehow do not fit our mold or expectations. Let’s face it – our wards consist of people full of personalities, preferences, quirks, and rough edges that collide with our own.

And this is an uncomfortable and beautiful reality.

Sandpaper people are part of God’s refining fire where we are to come together in unity of faith, common consent, and edifying and strengthening one another in the faith. Not because they are problematic. Not because they may appear less spiritual. And certainly, not because they are annoying obstacles to our worship. Because Our Heavenly Father, in his infinite wisdom, places us in communities where our rough edges meet theirs – and in that friction, something holy happens. Something we may not ever choose, yet something we desperately need.

Elder Patrick Kearon opened up the Saturday Morning Session of General Conference with a message titled About His Business” regarding how our service is a choice, an offering to God and a blessing. He appears to reframe the local ward, not as a social club for the like-minded individuals. Instead, he provided insight on how this may be a divine place of fellowship. A place where the friction of serving people who are “very different to us” creates the heat necessary to forge Christlike virtues – charity, meekness, and forgiveness – that simply may not be developed in isolation. If you’ve ever struggled to find your place in a diverse congregation, you are not failing the test; you are finally in the right place.

I want to take a moment and walk with you as we bridge the gap between modern apostolic counsel and ancient scripture. To understand how The Body of Christ requires every different member to function – and the reason our growth depends on the person sitting three pews away.

Read More »

The Ten Plagues, The Apocalypse, and The Ascent of the Saints: From Exodus to Revelation and the Doctrine of Exaltation

We are stepping into one of the most overlooked patterns within the scriptural narrative of Exodus chapters 7-13 – the journey from the Ten Plagues of Egypt to Exaltation – Divine Glory with Christ and the Father. We are going to look at the trajectory of moving from darkness of Egypt to the radiance of the divine presence of the Father and the Son. From judgment to redemption. From mortality to immortality and eternal life with Christ (Moses 1:39).. The ten plagues are not ancient catastrophes; they are a prophetic roadmap foreshadowing how we are to become heirs and joint-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17). Having overcome as He has overcame (Revelation 3:21) in order to sit with Christ on thrones the Father has prepared for each of us (Matthew 20:23).

Every plague reverses a day of creation. Every judgment against the Egyptian God’s, Pharaoh, and the Egyptian empire, culture, and society exposes a counterfeit god. And it is every act of divine power pushing Israel one step closer to the mountain of God. 

This is the pattern scripture reveals: descent into chaos, confrontation with darkness, and the ascent into God’s presence. Exodus establishes the divine architectural blueprint that Revelation completes. 

Christ, and the infinite atonement that is revealed through the plan of salvation, is at the center. It is the redemptive arc narrative – the covenantal path of righteousness we enter into. From the blood in the Nile to the blood of the Lamb of God slain from the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8), the story is always pointing forward. The plagues themselves reveal the cost of spiritual rebellion. However, they also reveal the depth of God’s divine sovereign grace and mercy. 

The Passover Lamb, the Firstborn Son, the deliverance through water – baptism for the remission of sinsthese are not mere isolated events. They are shadows of Christ’s victory over sin, death, and spiritual bondage (Matthew 16:18-26). 

The purpose of God is specific: to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man (Moses 1:39). It was never about escape. God was not simply removing Israel from Egypt; He was raising them into a people with a covenantal identity. Today, our Heavenly Father’s desire is to do the same with each one of us. Bring us out of our own Egypts, our own spiritual bondage, to awaken us so that we may arise from the dust and shake off the awful chains that hold us bound (Isaiah 52:2) so that we are able to put on the armor of righteousness and come forth out of obscurity (2 Nephi 1:23). 

The plagues themselves are the very chain breakers. Sinai is where a covenant people are formed. The story of the Exodus is not complete because the redeemed will eventually stand in the glory of God’s presence. For this is what Christ prayed for: This is life eternal that they may know thee, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent (John 17:3). 

Revelation mirrors Exodus because the same God is acting. the bowls, the trumpets, the judgments – they echo the plagues because the final deliverance follows the same pattern as the first. The Saints are not merely escaping Egypt, Babylon, or Jerusalem; they are ascending into divine heavenly Glory, ascending into the New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Temple (Ezekiel 48:35; Revelation 3:12; Revelation 21-22; apocryphal works 4 Ezra, 2 Baruch, 3 Baruch). Directly into the presence of the Lamb of God. 

Reason this matters for us today is because every one of us walks this specific journey of spiritual growth and covenantal faith. We are moving from bondage to freedom. From darkness and into light, from spiritual Egypts to the mountain of a Holy Sovereign and Gracious God. The plagues themselves show us the cost of our sin, our spiritual rebellion, and disobedience. They also reveal God’s divine grace, His tender mercies, and the unstoppable trajectory of redemption – from plagues to glory is our covenantal path of righteousness and movement toward spiritual perfection and strait and narrow way that leads toward the Celestial Kingdom (Matthew 7:14). 

So, as we begin, keep this truth in mind: God does not leave His people in the place of judgment or condemnation. He leads them through it, beyond it, and into divine heavenly glory. The Exodus narrative is our own personal story and the ascent into immortality, eternal life, and exaltation is our calling. 

Read More »

1974/75 – Melchizedek Priesthood Manual | Doctrine Lesson 4: How to Study and Ponder the Scriptures

One of the most common criticisms against the Latter-day Saint Faith is the lack of studying the scriptures. Yet, when one searches any given general conference address, there is plenty of counsel from the General Authorities regarding how significant and important scripture study is to the Latter-day Saint faith. This includes the recent implementation of the Come Follow Me curriculum, where members are highly encouraged to study and discuss the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Those who claim we do not focus our study on the Bible (Old and New Testament) are most likely those individuals who lacked the spiritual fortitude and discipline of implementing a strong scriptural study, memorization, as a daily spiritual discipline of a solid and genuine Christian life. However, those who give themselves over to centering on the spiritual discipline of scripture study—not merely to find answers to questions, doubt, or crises of faith—begin to notice a real transformation. This transformation occurs the moment one starts noticing the questions God is personally asking of them.

Today, we are a culture and society drowning in commentary while starving for genuine revelation. How often have you skimmed over the Come Follow Me lessons without ever stepping into the deeper layers? Consider the importance of studying the patterns, understanding the Ancient Near East context, discerning the covenant signals, and exploring the spiritual architecture beneath the words. How often have you decided that what you are reading may not be applicable to you in your current moment, spiritual growth, and development of faith in who Christ is?

The hope for this post, and its related content, is to show how we are to study the scriptures instead of merely skimming over them. The objective is to illustrate how to effectively ponder them instead of merely performing, allowing the scriptures to read us as much as we read and study them. This deep approach fosters genuine connection and reflection, moving beyond a superficial reading to something profoundly transformative.

Perhaps you have spent years building a devotional practice shaped by simple guidance and principles yet have not looked into ancient sources and evidence-based spiritual formation. Our approach to scripture study must be transparent, grounded, and truly lived out. Committing to the daily spiritual discipline of not merely reading the scriptures, but engaging with them meaningfully, can lead to profound effects. This involves effectively asking questions, taking notes, and having the courage to mark and notate specific information—not just for comprehension but for incorporation, application, and living out the principal truths of the scriptures in our everyday lives.

We are to strive to seek divine revelation from our Heavenly Father on how the scriptures resonate with us and our lives today. Such a quest fosters an enriching dialogue between the Divine and us, leading to insights that can illuminate our personal paths.

Scriptures serve the crucial purpose of anchoring us in a solid foundation of revelation regarding who Jesus Christ is, the purpose our lives offer, and the meaning we derive from knowing who we are through Christ. Understanding these principles enriches our faith, providing a strong assurance in Him. We are doctrinally anchored, continuously growing in faith, light, and truth, and living out the Law and Gospel of Christ in every facet of our lives. This multifaceted approach to scripture study invites us into a deeper relationship with the Divine, encourages us to discern divine truths in our contemporary contexts, and leads us toward a more purposeful and engaged Christian life. As we venture into this commitment, we find not just knowledge but wisdom and revelation that transforms our hearts and minds.

Read More »

What Phil Gets Wrong About the LDS Faith: Bible Corruption Claims and Joseph Smith’s ‘Abomination’ Statement Explained

For years, critics have repeated the same two accusations: that Latter‑day Saints “claim the Bible is corrupted,” and that Joseph Smith condemned all Christian ministers as “abominable.” These claims sound alarming—until you actually examine them closely. What becomes clear, very quickly, is that the real issue isn’t Mormonism at all. It’s the fragile framework of biblical infallibility and inerrancy that many critics bring to the conversation. When that framework is held up to the light of mainstream biblical scholarship, it collapses under its own weight, revealing the complexities and nuances that are often overlooked in the heated discourse surrounding religious beliefs.

The truth is far more grounded and far less sensational than the accusations imply. Latter‑day Saints simply affirm what conservative, moderate, and liberal scholars have acknowledged for more than a century: the Bible has a complex transmission history, contains missing writings, and reflects genuine human processes of preservation. This acknowledgment isn’t fringe thinking, nor is it merely “Mormon doctrine.” It represents the academic consensus that has emerged from rigorous study and analysis. Once you grasp this broader context, the accusations directed at Joseph Smith and the Restoration begin to appear less like informed critique and more like a double standard rooted in presuppositional inerrancy—a lens through which some critics view scripture without truly considering the historical and scholarly evidence that informs our understanding of biblical texts.

My goal in this analysis is simple yet profound: to cut through the rhetoric that often obscures fruitful dialogue, examine the evidence with an open mind, and demonstrate why the claims repeated by critics don’t hold up—not because of LDS apologetics, but because of the very scholarship on which his own tradition depends. When we follow the data, explore the history, and apply logic, a far clearer picture begins to emerge—one that not only restores trust but also deepens understanding. This deeper comprehension invites a more honest and constructive conversation about scripture, revelation, and the Restoration. Engaging in this dialogue can lead to better mutual respect and a recognition of the shared elements found within our diverse faith traditions, fostering an environment where questions can be asked, and insights can be exchanged without the burden of past misconceptions.

Read More »

The Architecture of Anger: Navigating Threats, Expectations, and Addiction in the Refiner’s Fire of Recovery

Anger is not a random eruption. It is a structure—a system of triggers, distortions, and emotional wounds that form a predictable pattern. This understanding of anger as a structured response is crucial because it helps us identify the root causes of our emotions rather than viewing them as mere spontaneous reactions. In recovery, gaining insights into this architecture becomes essential for healing and personal growth. Consider this, “Anger is a progressive challenge in recovery and a symptom of deeper pain.”

This notion emphasizes that anger often masks underlying issues, such as unresolved trauma, anxiety, or fear. By acknowledging these connections, we can address the true sources of our anger instead of simply reacting to it. When we learn to map its components—recognizing our triggers, understanding the distortions in our thought patterns, and confronting our emotional wounds—we stop being acted upon by these feelings.

In doing so, we transition from a passive experience of anger to one where we can act with spiritual clarity and agency. This active engagement allows us to express our emotions constructively, facilitating healthier interactions and fostering deeper connections with ourselves and others. Embracing the complexity of anger paves the way for genuine healing and allows for the development of coping strategies that contribute to a balanced emotional life. Ultimately, this journey empowers us to reclaim our well-being and operate from a place of understanding and compassion.

Read More »

Part II – Lesson 6: The Church of the First Century

Every surviving document from the earliest Christians points to one unmistakable reality: the Church of Jesus Christ was never meant to drift, improvise, or evolve by popular opinion. It was governed—actively, visibly, and globally—by living apostles who traveled, taught, corrected, and unified the Saints across thousands of miles. The idea of a fragmented, locally‑run Christianity would have been unrecognizable to the men and women who lived under apostolic direction.

Archaeologists mapping Roman travel networks now show how apostles could realistically maintain jurisdiction across vast distances. Historians studying Acts 15 identify the Jerusalem Council as the first Christian governing council—binding on every congregation. And New Testament scholars across traditions agree that Peter’s leadership was real, but never monarchical. The earliest Church functioned through a council of apostles, not a solitary bishop and not independent local leaders.

This emerging academic consensus paints a picture that looks far more like the Latter‑day Saint model of apostolic governance than the later structures of Catholicism, Orthodoxy, or Protestantism.

When Latter‑day Saints speak of a living quorum of apostles with worldwide jurisdiction, we are not inventing a new ecclesiology—we are recovering the original one. The historical record, the New Testament, and the best modern scholarship converge on the same point: the Church Christ established was led by a unified body of apostles who held authority for the entire household of faith.

This is the pattern that disappeared after their deaths. This is the pattern the Restoration restores.

What to Look for in this Lesson: 

  1. Most of the religions of the first century of the Christian era stressed the acquisition of salvation through mystical initiatory rites or elaborate ceremonies. Christianity ignored these aspects of religion and stressed a high standard of moral conduct. 
  2. Christianity was a rapidly expanding movement in the first century. Arrangements were made for supervision so that it would not become disunited. 
  3. Enrichment material. In Apostasy from the Divine Church, pp. 39-77 can be found some unique quotations and comments concerning the doctrines and worship of the early Christian church. 

How This Lesson Functions in LDS Apologetics

Apostolic jurisdiction is not an abstract ecclesiological idea—it is the structural backbone of the New Testament Church. Showing that the earliest Christians were governed by a mobile, authoritative quorum of apostles accomplishes three apologetic goals:

  • It demonstrates that the original Church was hierarchical, organized, and led by living apostles, not by Scripture alone or by independent congregations.
  • It shows that later Christian structures—papal monarchy, conciliar episcopacy, or Protestant congregationalism—do not match the first‑century pattern.
  • It clarifies that the Restoration restores a model that actually existed, rather than inventing a new one.

This lesson therefore becomes a bridge between historical reconstruction and Restoration theology.

Read More »

The “All or Nothing” Fallacy: Why Tyson Guess’s Logic Fails the Scriptural and Historical Test

If there is any given reason for someone to question and leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Tyson Guess has built a shiny logical-looking exit ramp. However, if you are willing to take a moment and slow down to breathe, the architecture of his argument is built on a very sandy foundation – specifically, a fundamental misunderstanding of how God interacts with fallible mortals.

It is in his recent article over at Medium – “One False Revelation Collapses Mormonism” – where he attempts to use the Book of Abraham as a silver bullet to take down the entire Latter-day Saint Faith. He proposes that because the surviving Egyptian papyri does not match the Book of Abraham linguistically, one ought to conclude that Prophet Joseph Smith was a fraud. By extension, he claims that this means the Book of Mormon is a lie perpetuated upon the 19th-Century American populace—and by many individuals today.

What Guess seems to overlook is that faith and belief systems are complex, multifaceted experiences that often transcend mere textual analysis. Having immersed myself in the scriptures and extensively researched various scholarly articles on the Bible, the Book of Mormon, and the Book of Abraham, I am not one to shy away from the hard questions that arise. Indeed, grappling with difficult topics is an integral part of faith development.

Moreover, it is important to remember that neither the Church nor its members need to hide from the papyri or the so-called “missing scroll” theories. These subjects, when approached with integrity and a commitment to truth, can lead to a deepened understanding of the faith. Once we apply proper scriptural exegesis and peer-reviewed scholarship to the questions surrounding these texts, Guess’s assertion of an “inescapable conclusion” begins to look more like a desperate reach rather than a definitive argument against the faith.

Ultimately, it’s essential to recognize the broader context in which these discussions occur. Many who leave or reconsider their faith do so not only based on intellectual arguments but also due to personal experiences, feelings, and the intricate tapestry of their spiritual lives. Engaging with such matters requires not only scholarly rigor but also compassion and understanding for individual journeys. The dialogue around faith and doubt can be rich and illuminating, offering avenues for personal growth and deeper connections with God and each other.

If the Book of Mormon is true, the Book of Abraham must be true.

The Book of Abraham is demonstrably false.

Therefore the Book of Mormon is false.

That is not a rhetorical flourish. It is a logical necessity rooted in the nature of God himself. God does not put his name on lies. God does not commission a prophet and then authorize that prophet to deliver falsehood as scripture. A divine commission that produces falsehood is not divine. Which means the two books stand or fall together. They claim the same origin: the gift and power of God through Joseph Smith. That origin is either reliable, or it is not. It cannot be selectively reliable. If one product of that commission is demonstrably false, the commission itself is false, and everything resting on it falls with it.

This article proves each premise. By the end, the conclusion is inescapable.

Tyson Guess’s argument rests upon presuppositional apologetics and is quite a rigid syllogism where he makes the first point regarding how the Book of Abraham stand or fall together. The second point is how he views the Book of Abraham as “demonstrably false” because it is not a literal linguistic translation of the surviving papyri. And third, he concludes that because the Book of Abraham and the Book of Mormon are false, Joseph Smith, therefore, is a false prophet under the presupposed interpretative understanding of Deuteronomy 18. His argument leads to the conclusion that the entire Latter-day Saint belief system collapses under scrutiny.

Steelmanning Tyson Guess’s Assertions

The strongest point he makes is the physical evidence: the Sensen papyri (the fragments recovered in 1967)1 do indeed contain standard Egyptian funerary texts (The Book of Breathings) and do not contain the text of the Book of Abraham. This mismatch is acknowledged by the Church in the Gospel Topics Essays, which lends credibility to his claim. If one’s definition of “translation” is strictly limited to a 21st-century academic decoding of hieroglyphs, Guess’s point feels quite weighty and compelling.

However, to thoroughly engage with Guess’s perspective, it is essential to steelman his position—articulating it in its strongest form—before launching into a counter-argument. A steelman approach involves understanding the nuances of his claims, thus allowing for a more productive discourse. From there, one can examine the logical fallacies that underlie his assertions, such as potential fallacies of composition—implying that the failure of one work invalidates the entirety of a belief system—or false dilemmas that oversimplify complex theological concepts.

In addressing the primary contention regarding translations, scholars advocate for a broader understanding of the term “translation.” The restoration of the Book of Abraham is often viewed not merely as a linguistic exercise but as a theological endeavor. Thus, one might argue that the translation in question relies on Divine inspiration rather than strict linguistic fidelity. An exegetical interpretation of the text could highlight its contextual significance within the framework of Latter-day Saint theology, countering Guess’s assertion of its demonstrable falsehood.

Engaging with peer-reviewed literature reveals diverse scholarly opinions on ancient texts, translations, and the role of revelatory processes in religious contexts. Numerous Latter-day Saint scholars and Egyptologists have contributed rigorous analyses of the Book of Abraham, arguing that the text retains spiritual truths even if its historical and linguistic basis is complex.

While it is necessary to acknowledge the weight of Tyson Guess’s arguments, it is equally important to invite readers to examine the evidence for themselves rigorously. The discourse surrounding the Book of Abraham is multifaceted, integrating historical, linguistic, and theological dimensions. Encouraging critical thought fosters a more robust conversation, allowing individuals to explore the nuances of faith, history, and evidence as they pertain to the Latter-day Saint belief system. Through this lens, one can engage not only with the arguments presented but also with the broader implications for understanding religious texts in a modern context.

Read More »