Tag: Premortal Christ

Melchizedek Priesthood Study Manual – 1974/75 | Doctrine Lesson 5: In Whom Do You Have Faith

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

Is Jesus Christ Jehovah? That question sits at the center of Latter‑day Saint belief and shapes how scripture, worship, and devotion fit together.

Many Latter‑day Saints answer this simply: yes. The claim that Jesus Christ is Jehovah—the God of the Old Testament—threads through the Bible, the Book of Mormon, and modern LDS scripture. When you read those texts together, a single, continuous picture of the Savior emerges: the same divine Being who made covenants with Israel is the One who came to earth, taught, and atoned for us.

Scriptural Evidence That Connects the Names

The Old Testament presents Jehovah as Israel’s covenant‑making, creative, and redeeming God. The New Testament introduces Jesus as the divine Word who was with God in the beginning and through whom all things were made. The Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants pick up that same thread and make the connection explicit. For example, when the resurrected Savior declares, “Behold, I am Jesus Christ” (3 Nephi 11:10–11), it reads as a direct fulfillment of the prophetic voice that spoke for God in earlier scripture.

Prophecies such as Isaiah 9:6 calling the coming child “Mighty God,” and John 1:1–3 identifying the Word as God, point to one eternal actor in salvation history. Passages like Colossians 1:16, which speak of Christ’s role in creation, reinforce the idea that the One who created and guided Israel is the same One who walked the earth as Jesus.

LDS Doctrinal Context

Latter‑day Saint teaching emphasizes that Jehovah is Jesus Christ. Modern prophets and revelations encourage members to read the Old and New Testaments together with latter‑day scripture, seeing continuity rather than contradiction. The doctrine of premortality—where Jesus is chosen as Savior before the world’s foundation (see Abraham 3:27)—underscores that His divine role predates His mortal life. Doctrine and Covenants passages that affirm the Lord’s universal lordship further shape this understanding.

Why This Matters for Faith and Practice

Seeing Jesus as Jehovah changes how scripture is read and how worship is lived. It ties the covenants and promises of Israel to the life, Atonement, and Resurrection of Christ. That continuity makes the Savior’s teachings feel less like a new chapter and more like the central thread of a single, unfolding story. For believers, it deepens trust in His unchanging nature and invites a more personal relationship with the God who has always been involved in human history.

Curious how Latter‑day Saints answer the question, “Is Jesus Christ Jehovah?” — and why it matters? Read more to see a clear, scripture‑rooted explanation that’s both simple and soul‑stirring.

Read More »

5 Solid Reasons the Abrahamic Covenant Makes the Trinity Impossible: The Father and Son Revealed in Scripture

Timothy R. BermanLeave a comment

For centuries, Christians have read Genesis 22 as a foreshadowing of Christ’s sacrifice. But when you slow down and actually study the text — the covenant structure, the typology, the roles of Abraham, Isaac, and the Angel of the Lord — something startling emerges:

The story only makes sense if the Father and the Son are separate, distinct divine beings. Not one being in three manifestations. Not “without body, parts, or passions.” Not the metaphysics of the 4th‑century creeds.

Genesis 22 quietly dismantles the classical Trinity — not through argument, but through narrative logic. The intricate details within the text draw attention to the unique roles played by each character involved, suggesting a profound relationship rather than a singularity of essence. The distinct actions and motivations of Abraham and Isaac, coupled with the divine intervention of the Angel of the Lord, create a rich tapestry of covenantal dynamics that aligns with the understanding of a separate Father and Son.

And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

The text itself tells us that Abraham’s offering of Isaac was “a similitude of God and His Only Begotten Son” (Jacob 4:5). That means the story is not merely symbolic — it is covenantal drama. A reenactment. A prophetic preview. It sets up a scenario where the identity of God is not just established by abstract definitions, but by tangible actions and relationships that unfold throughout the narrative, reinforcing the need for distinct divine entities within the story.

  • Abraham = the Father (El Elyon)
  • Isaac = the Son (YHWH / Jesus Christ)
  • The Angel of the Lord = YHWH intervening
  • The Ram = the substitute sacrifice provided by the Son Himself

But here’s the problem for classical Trinitarian theology:

A being cannot covenant with Himself. A being cannot offer Himself to Himself. A being cannot substitute for Himself.

Yet that is exactly what the Abrahamic narrative requires if the Father and the Son are not distinct beings. The narrative requires a sacrificial offering that conveys deep relational significance. The act of Abraham being asked to sacrifice his son not only serves as a test of faith, but also as a prelude to a much greater divine act of love and sacrifice. The intricacies presented in Genesis 22 reflect the essence of divine relationships that contradict the notion of a singular being.

The entire story collapses under Nicene metaphysics — but it becomes beautifully coherent in a Latter‑day Saint reading of the Godhead. This perspective not only makes sense of the narrative but also invites readers to engage with the text in a way that reveals a more nuanced understanding of who God is in a relationship with humanity.

This isn’t sensationalism. It’s careful, text‑driven theology supported by biblical scholarship and restored scripture. Scholars widely recognize Genesis 22 as a covenantal test and a typology of divine sacrifice. The events leading to the sacrificial act have a resonance throughout scripture, inviting further exploration of God’s nature and His intentions toward His children.

The Book of Mormon explicitly identifies the event as a similitude of the Father and the Son (Jacob 4:5), strengthening the argument for distinct divine persons within the Abrahamic narrative. Classical creeds describe God as “without body, parts, or passions” (Westminster Confession). That metaphysical framework cannot sustain the relational, embodied, covenantal drama of Genesis 22. It lacks the relational depth that is essential to understanding the interactions within the story.

In this article, we’ll walk through:

  • Why the Abraham–Isaac narrative presupposes two divine persons in real covenantal relationship.
  • How the cut covenant (Genesis 15) requires two parties who can engage in meaningful interaction.
  • Why the Angel of the Lord is best understood as YHWH, the premortal Christ, intervening in history with divine purpose.
  • Why the ram, not a lamb, matters significantly as a symbol of substitutionary sacrifice.
  • And how all of this aligns seamlessly with Latter‑day Saint theology while exposing the weaknesses of post‑biblical Trinitarian formulations.

If you’ve ever sensed that the God of the creeds feels abstract, distant, or philosophically over‑engineered, Genesis 22 offers a different vision — one rooted in relationship, embodiment, covenant, and divine love that is anything but passionless. Through this lens, one can find a God who is intimately involved in the lives of His people, crafting a narrative of redemption that resonates with both ancient and modern believers.

Read More »