When You Don’t Know What to Do, Keep Your Eyes on God | 2 Chronicles 14–20; 26; 30

Come, Follow Me — July 20–26, 2026: “Our Eyes Are Upon Thee”

What do you do when the opposition is greater than your strength, the pressure is greater than your wisdom, and you honestly do not know what to do next?

This week’s Come, Follow Me study takes us into the lives of kings, prophets, reformers, worshippers, and ordinary families who faced that very question. Their stories reveal that peace does not come from pretending the battle is small. It comes from knowing where to turn when the battle is bigger than you.

Through the accounts of Asa, Micaiah, Jehoshaphat, Uzziah, and Hezekiah, 2 Chronicles invites us to examine where we place our trust, how we respond to correction, and whether our eyes remain fixed upon the Lord when fear, success, pride, or division threaten to pull them away. Each of these figures faced formidable challenges—be it external armies, internal strife, or the temptations of power—and their responses provide valuable lessons for our own lives.

Asa, for instance, shows how reliance on God in times of trouble can lead to unexpected victories, while Micaiah reminds us of the importance of courage in standing for truth, even in the face of overwhelming opposition. Jehoshaphat’s alliance-building and pursuit of divine guidance highlight the significance of seeking God’s will in decision-making, especially when circumstances seem dire. Uzziah’s rise to power illustrates the fine line between humility in success and the dangers of pride, reminding us that acknowledgment of our dependence on God is crucial. Lastly, Hezekiah’s prayer in times of crisis demonstrates that sincere reliance on divine help can yield miraculous outcomes.

This week’s study encourages us to reflect deeply on our own lives. When confronted with overwhelming pressure, do we allow our fears to overshadow our faith? Are we quick to seek advice from sources that may not align with our beliefs? Or do we, like these biblical figures, turn our attention steadfastly to God, trusting that He will guide us through our fiercest battles? Through these narratives, we learn that true peace comes from steadfast faith and a commitment to seek God’s wisdom relentlessly, no matter how insurmountable the obstacles may appear.

Read More »

Book of Mormon Contradictions? Paul Gee and Timothy Berman Discuss Mosiah 18

Tonight, Faith & Reason hosts a focused livestream discussion between Paul Gee and Timothy R. Berman examining one of the central arguments raised against the Book of Mormon: the claim that Mosiah 18 contains biblical and historical contradictions.

The discussion will stream live directly on this page.

Watch the Livestream

Date: July 14, 2026
Time: 4:30 PM Pacific / 5:30 PM Mountain
Participants: Paul Gee and Timothy R. Berman
Topic: Baptism and the Church in Mosiah 18

The livestream video is embedded below. The broadcast will begin automatically when the event goes live.

Read More »

He Trusted in the Lord: When Faith Is Challenged and Reform Becomes Necessary | Come Follow Me 2 Kings 16–25

Let’s face the reality and truth: Our faith is going to be tested time and time again. Much of the time, there are going to be those seasons where our faith is not tested through seasons of silence. Instead, they are going to be tested through seasons where there are clamor and noise.

The Assyrian voice outside the wall is quite loud. The threat is very public. The accusation is calculated. And the enemy does not merely attack Jerusalem’s defenses; the enemy attacks Jerusalem’s confidence in God. I want to say this again: The enemy does not merely attack Jerusalem’s defenses because the enemy attacks Jerusalem’s confidence in God. This becomes a powerful tension in 2 Kings 16-25. For good reason, because the issue is not only whether Judah is capable of surviving Assyria or Babylon. The deeper question is whether God’s people will trust the Lord when worldly power looks more practical than covenant faithfulness.

This week’s Come Follow Me lesson, “He Trusted in the Lord God of Israel,” places us in some of the darkest years of Israel and Judah’s history. The Northern Kingdom is conquered and scattered by Assyria. Whereas the Southern Kingdom struggles with idolatry, compromise, fear, reform, and eventual destruction. Yet in the middle of spiritual rebellion and decline, two kings stand out: Kink Hezekiah, who trusted the Lord when Jerusalem was threatened, and King Josiah who seemed to turn to scripture and renew covenants when the Book of the Law was rediscovered. The latter resulting in what scholars refer to as the Deuteronomist Reform or the Josiah Reformation. Bridging first temple Judaism with the movement toward what will become the Second Temple era of Jewish history.

The contrast here is quite sobering as Ahaz looked to Assyria for security and compromised the First Temple – or Solomon’s Temple. While Hezekiah seemed to turn to look unto the Lord and went to the temple in prayer. Josiah heard the scriptures, humbled himself, and led a reform that reshaped Jewish history and religious worship. Zedekiah rebelled and Babylon rose up – bringing destruction upon Jerusalem. It’s destruction of the city and temple a fulfillment of prophecy the Jew’s of First Temple Jerusalem refused to accept.

These chapters teach that trust is not something built upon sentimental optimism. Trust is built on covenantal loyalty while under pressure and enduring the refiner’s fire.

Read More »

Afflicted, Yet Highly Favored | Finding God’s Goodness in a Broken World — 1 Nephi 1

What does it truly mean to be highly favored of God?

Many of us carry an underlying assumption that if we are faithful, life should become easier. We expect obedience to produce comfort, clarity, answered prayers, and protection from suffering. Yet Jesus never promised a life without hardship. He said, “In the world ye shall have tribulation,” but then added, “be of good cheer; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33). Nephi begins his record with this same tension. He had “seen many afflictions,” and yet he described himself as “highly favored of the Lord” (1 Nephi 1:1).

How can both be true?

Perhaps God’s favor is not proven by the hardships He prevents, but by His presence within the hardships we endure. Joseph was falsely accused and imprisoned, yet even there “the Lord was with Joseph, and shewed him mercy” (Genesis 39:20–21). Divine favor does not always mean receiving the life we hoped to have. Sometimes it means discovering the life God is forming within us through His goodness, grace, and sustaining presence.

Nephi does not deny or minimize his afflictions. Instead, he interprets them through his “great knowledge of the goodness and the mysteries of God” (1 Nephi 1:1).

That distinction matters.

Affliction was part of Nephi’s story, but it was not the final meaning of his story. As Paul later taught, tribulation can produce patience, experience, and hope because the love of God is poured into our hearts through the Holy Ghost (Romans 5:3–5).

First Nephi chapter 1 begins with affliction and divine favor, but it ends with faith and divine deliverance. Between those two declarations, Jerusalem receives a prophetic warning (1 Nephi 1:4). Lehi prays “with all his heart” on behalf of his people (1 Nephi 1:5). Heaven opens, revelation comes, and Lehi is called to testify of the Messiah and “the redemption of the world” (1 Nephi 1:19).

The people reject his message, mock him, and seek his life. Yet rejection does not have the final word. Nephi concludes by declaring that “the tender mercies of the Lord” are over those who exercise faith, making them mighty “unto the power of deliverance” (1 Nephi 1:20). Even God’s warnings reveal His mercy. The Lord declares that He takes no pleasure in destruction but desires that the wicked turn from their ways and live (Ezekiel 33:11). God warns because He loves. He confronts because He desires repentance, healing, and restoration.

God’s warnings are expressions of His mercy, and those who respond in faith will discover His power to deliver.

Today, we will walk through 1 Nephi chapter 1 and examine how Nephi interpreted his afflictions through God’s goodness and tender mercies.

We will see Lehi respond to a broken world with intercessory prayer rather than condemnation. We will examine how revelation led him to proclaim Jesus Christ and redemption. And we will discover why the rejection of God’s message could not overcome His power to preserve and deliver the faithful.

As we study, we must also ask ourselves: How are we interpreting our own afflictions? Are we measuring God’s goodness only by the circumstances we want Him to change? Could the correction or warning we are resisting actually be an expression of His mercy? Scripture does not promise that the righteous will avoid affliction. It declares, “Many are the afflictions of the righteous: but the Lord delivereth him out of them all” (Psalm 34:19).

God’s favor is not measured by the absence of hardship. It is revealed through His faithful presence, His goodness made known, and His sustaining mercy through every affliction. We may experience many afflictions and still be highly favored of the Lord. The hardship is real—but so are His tender mercies. And because His mercy is real, affliction does not have the final word.

Read More »

There Is a Prophet in Israel: When You Feel Surrounded, God Is Still Working | Come Follow Me 2 Kings 2–7

There were moments in my own life when the challenges seemed larger than the promise. The overall pressure felt immediate. Fear seemed quite rational. The surrounding issues seemed visible, measurable, and impossible to ignore. This is where Elisha’s servant saw when he woke and found the city surrounded by horses and chariots. The servant’s question was not dramatic, it is quite human: “Alas, my master! How shall we do?”

Elisha did not deny the reality of the danger. He did not pretend the army was not there. He simply saw more than the servant saw. His answer is one of the great faith-building declarations of scripture: “Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.” Elisha, then, prayed that the Lord will open the young man’s eyes, and suddenly the mountain was filled with heavenly help. The issue had not changed, the servant’s vision had.

This is the very heart of this week’s Come Follow Me lesson in 2 Kings 2-7. The title of the lesson is, “There is a Prophet in Israel,” and it walks us through the ministry of Elisha, the successor of Elijah. These chapters are filled with miracles: water healed, oil multiplied, a child raised, poisoned food purified, bread multiplied, Naaman cleansed, an ax head recovered, armies restrained, and prophetic words fulfilled. Yet the deeper message is not merely how miracles happened, nor how long ago they happened, because the deeper message is that the Lord still works through covenant faith, prophetic authority, humble obedience, and spiritual eyes that learn to see beyond fear and doubt.

The official Come Follow Me material notes that although Elisha’s record does not preserve much of his direct teaching, his miracles testify of Christ’s life-giving, nourishing, and healing power. These miracles point us to the Savior who raises, feeds, cleanses, restores, and opens up eyes. They invite us to ask the same prayer Elisha offered: Lord, open our eyes, that we may see.

Read More »

Rehoboam’s Pride, Elijah’s Fire & the Voice You’re Missing | 1 Kings 12-13; 17–22 CFM

Choose This Day: Finding Christ in the Divided Kingdoms of Our Lives

Quite frankly, I am grateful for the many people who have come into my life and spoken to me directly, compassionately, and with genuine understanding. They showed patience and grace without sitting in judgment over me. They met me in difficult and messy moments, listened to what I was carrying, and helped me confront unhealthy attitudes and behaviors without condemning me.

Yet, if I am completely honest, I have also carried resentment, bitterness, self-hatred, and anger toward people whom I believed had betrayed, ignored, or abandoned me.

Every one of us is shaped—lifted, wounded, strengthened, or misled—by the voices we choose to follow.

Families may rise or fall because of those voices. Communities may flourish or fracture because of them. Our faith may deepen or drift depending on whose counsel we trust and whose influence we permit to guide our decisions.

Much of the pain we carry may be traced to someone who used influence selfishly—or to someone who possessed the ability to help but refused to use it.

The opposite is also true.

Some of the deepest healing we experience comes through Christlike leaders, mentors, friends, and disciples who choose to show up, serve, and sacrifice. They meet us in places where others might pass by. They take time to understand, comfort, encourage, and help us move forward without excusing destructive behavior or enabling us to remain stuck.

That tension between selfish influence and Christlike service stands at the heart of this week’s Come, Follow Me study for June 29–July 5: “If the Lord Be God, Follow Him,” covering 1 Kings 12–13 and 17–22.

Read More »

What the Divinity of Jesus Christ Means to You

Why Jesus Alone Could Accomplish the Infinite and Eternal Atonement

What manner of man commands the wind and sea—and they obey Him? He who speaks to the chaotic elements and they submit to His will, revealing His divine authority over nature itself. His voice echoes through the storm, bringing peace where there was turmoil, demonstrating an unparalleled mastery that transcends human understanding.

What manner of man possesses the power to lay down His life and take it up again? He who, with the authority inherent to His being, presents the ultimate sacrifice, fully aware of the weight of such a decision. In laying down His life, He unveils the profound mystery of love and redemption. The same strength that allows Him to give Himself away also empowers Him to conquer death, rising triumphantly to provide hope and eternal life to humanity.

What manner of man suffers more than mortal humanity can endure, yet remains until the work of redemption is complete? He bears the weight of all humanity’s sins, feeling the depths of anguish and despair, yet persevering through the agony to fulfill His purpose. His empathy is boundless, experiencing sorrow in ways that only a divine nature could comprehend. In His endurance, He illustrates the profound depth of grace, revealing that true strength is often displayed in vulnerability and unwavering commitment to a higher calling, despite the unbearable cost.

This man is a testament to the coexistence of power and humility, a divine figure whose actions reshape the narrative of humanity’s relationship with the Creator. His life and legacy stand as an eternal beacon of hope, a call to embrace the extraordinary potential within each of us to rise above our circumstances and to foster love, compassion, and redemption in a world so often in need of these gifts.

These questions stand at the center of Doctrine Lesson 6, “What the Divinity of Jesus Christ Means to You,” from the 1974–75 Melchizedek Priesthood study guide When Thou Art Converted, Strengthen Thy Brethren. The lesson’s purpose was not merely to establish that Jesus was extraordinary. It invited priesthood holders to understand why Jesus Christ alone possessed power to accomplish the infinite and eternal Atonement—and why every one of us remains completely dependent upon Him.

Nearly five decades later, that central purpose remains unchanged. Some of the language used in the original lesson, however, has generated theological questions and apologetic controversy. In particular, statements by James E. Talmage and Bruce R. McConkie about Christ’s literal divine sonship have been interpreted by critics as teaching that God the Father physically descended and engaged in sexual intercourse with Mary.

A responsible modern treatment must do more than dismiss that criticism. It must distinguish among what scripture reveals, what individual Church leaders have proposed or speculated, and what the Church currently teaches as established doctrine.

It is best we do not allow controversy over the manner of Christ’s conception to distract us from the greater truth: Jesus Christ did for us what we could never do for ourselves.

Read More »

The Battle Is the Lord’s: Facing Your Goliath with Faith in Jesus Christ

Come Follow Me | June 15-21 | “The battle is the Lord’s.” —1 Samuel 17:47

There are seasons in life when the challenge standing before us seems larger than our faith, stronger than our resolve, and better equipped than anything we possess. We may know the language of faith, remember the promises of scripture, and sincerely believe that God is with us, yet the giant still appears to dominate the valley. It calls attention to our weakness, rehearses our failures, magnifies our fears, and confidently predicts our defeat.

For one person, that giant may be addiction or the relentless temptation to return to an old way of living. For another, it may be grief, rejection, loneliness, financial uncertainty, family conflict, shame, resentment, or the lingering consequences of decisions that cannot be undone. Some giants appear suddenly, while others have occupied the valley for years, issuing the same challenge every morning and evening until fear begins to feel like the natural condition of life.

The Come, Follow Me lesson for June 15–21, covering 1 Samuel 17–18; 24–26 and 2 Samuel 5–7, invites us to look again at David’s story and hear his declaration that “the battle is the Lord’s.” That declaration does not mean our participation is unnecessary, nor does it promise that discipleship will protect us from every difficulty. David still walked into the valley, selected the stones, prepared his sling, and confronted the enemy. What he refused to do was accept the assumption that the outcome depended entirely upon his own size, strength, resources, or experience.

David understood that he was participating in a battle whose final authority belonged to God.

That same truth can transform the way we approach our spiritual battles today. We do not have to pretend that our giants are small. We do not have to deny the pain, complexity, or danger of what stands before us. Faith does not require us to minimize reality; it teaches us to see reality within the greater reality of God’s power, covenant faithfulness, and redemptive purposes.

Read More »

Book of Mormon Contradictions? A Latter-day Saint Responds to Paul Gee on “Baptism” and “Church” in Mosiah 18

We are going to look at a very specific claim: that the Book of Mormon story of baptism in Mosiah is just Joseph Smith copying Acts 2 – and that baptism for the remission of sins could not have existed before Jesus Christ, therefore the Book of Mormon contradicts the Bible. If this is true, Latter-day Saint scripture definitely collapses. If it is not, then this criticism is built on a very sandy foundation. Let’s actually examine to see if such a claim has any credibility and validity to truth or if it is a false claim.

Now, I am not asking you to take my own word for it. I am asking that we open up the scriptures, open up our hearts and minds because we are going to walk through Paul Gee’s argument, steelman it, and then test it against scripture, history, and essential logic. By doing this, we can critically assess the merits of his claims and their implications for the understanding of both the Book of Mormon and biblical texts.

This is not an attack on Paul. In fact, he reached out and asked me to read it as it will supposedly prove that the Book of Mormon is false. And I will quote him fairly, present his argument in its strongest form, and will show how I believe it fails – scripturally, historically, and logically. By carefully dissecting the specifics of his argument, we can delve deeper into the theological and historical context of baptism and its significance within both texts.

Understanding that baptism as a practice existed in various forms before Christ and that the concept of a remission of sins is not exclusively tied to any one scripture, we must analyze whether the Old Testament precedents and the teachings of Christ later broaden our comprehension of baptism. This exploration will hopefully shed new light on claims made against the Book of Mormon, fostering a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the narrative within its pages.

As we navigate through this intricate discussion, I invite all readers to remain open-minded and reflect critically on the scriptures, drawing personal insights even as we engage with challenging interpretations. A sincere examination can lead us to a deeper faith and understanding of these profound spiritual texts.

Read More »

Does the LDS Faith Have 3 Kinds of God?

Are there three Gods within the LDS Faith, or is Matt Slick of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry making three specific category errors? He appears to contend that Latter-day Saint theology contains three types of gods. Yet, his conclusion seems to depend entirely on misunderstandings, inaccuracies in reading LDS sources, and the imposition of post-Nicene metaphysics onto texts that do not utilize them.

When we scrutinize Slick’s assertions, it becomes apparent that they stem from misrepresentations of key doctrinal points. The Latter-day Saint understanding of God emphasizes a singular divine nature, with a clear distinction between God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost, who are unified in purpose but distinct in being. This understanding challenges Slick’s insistence on a concept of multiple gods existing in separate categories, which does not align with LDS beliefs as how we interpret our scriptures and teachings.

By examining the categories he uses and applying a proper lens through which to analyze LDS doctrine, one may ultimately see that Slick’s arguments significantly falter. His framework seems to force the doctrine into a misunderstanding of the term ‘God,’ failing to account for the context and nuances within Latter-day Saint theology.

His claims not only misrepresent what Latter-day Saints uphold but also create contradictions within his argumentation regarding what he purports they teach. This is not merely a disagreement over religious interpretation; it represents a profound mischaracterization that undermines genuine discourse.

Today, I wish to respond to this critique with clarity, doctrinal precision, and integrity, standing firm in the belief that the truth of Latter-day Saint doctrine deserves to be presented honestly. It is vital that we engage with those who misunderstand or misrepresent our beliefs with a spirit of boldness and respect—exhorting and convincing the gainsayer (Titus 1:9) through proper correction and thoughtful rebuke (2 Timothy 3:16). By addressing these misunderstandings directly, we can foster a more accurate understanding of Latter-day Saint teachings and encourage meaningful dialogue that respects differences while seeking common ground.

Read More »